Comparison of differential reinforcement procedures for treating automatically reinforced behavior
Document Type
Thesis
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Psychology
Degree
M.S. Applied Behavior Analysis
Date Completed
2016
First Committee Member
Roscoe, Eileen
Second Committee Member
Bourret, Jason
Third Committee Member
Karsten, Amanda
Abstract
"Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit stereotypy that can be socially stigmatizing and interfere with education programs. Differential reinforcement interventions that have been used for treating automatically reinforced problem behavior are differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA). However, little research to date has compared their relative efficacy for decreasing automatically reinforced problem behavior while measuring effects on appropriate task engagement. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of DRO and DRA for decreasing automatically reinforced stereotypy and increasing appropriate task engagement and productivity. Two individuals with autism spectrum disorder were included. Results were inconclusive as to which treatment was relatively more effective for decreasing motor stereotypy, increasing productivity, and increasing engagement."
Recommended Citation
Keeler, Jason, "Comparison of differential reinforcement procedures for treating automatically reinforced behavior" (2016). Master’s Theses - College of Arts and Sciences. 123.
https://digitalcommons.wne.edu/castheses/123