Clinical decision making : comparison of data presentation methods
Document Type
Thesis
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Department
Psychology
Degree
M.S. Applied Behavior Analysis
Date Completed
2017
First Committee Member
Gould, Daniel
Second Committee Member
Karsina, Allen
Third Committee Member
Thompson, Rachel
Abstract
"Visual inspection of data displays is commonly used by behavior analysts. The data presentation method can affect decision making. In this study, cumulative record and latency graphs were evaluated by 13 behavior analysts. In Experiment 1, decision making was assessed through the number of sessions viewed when data were presented point-by-point as cumulative record versus latency graphs for a Test and a Control condition constructed from the same data sets. Experiment 2 assessed whether participants made the same data interpretation when viewing the complete data set as when viewing the partial data sets in Experiment 1. Results showed that in Experiment 1, participants viewed the lowest number of data points for the low variability latency graph; average number of data points viewed for the 3 other graphs were within +/- 1 point of each other. In Experiment 2, participants’ determination of the effect of the independent variable varied by graph type, with opposite conclusions reached for the cumulative record and low variability latency graphs. Comparison of conclusions reached across experiments showed that participants reached the same conclusion when viewing full data sets in Experiment 2 as they had when viewing partial data sets in Experiment 1. Differences in conclusions occasioned by the different graph types suggest that behavior analysts should use multiple methods of visual inspection of data."
Recommended Citation
von Rosen, Jenny Lynn, "Clinical decision making : comparison of data presentation methods" (2017). Master’s Theses - College of Arts and Sciences. 211.
https://digitalcommons.wne.edu/castheses/211